The Greenland Greater White-fronted Goose (Anser frontalis flavirostris) is known to be a rare visitor to northeastern North America, but I have never been satisfied with a reliable, objective way of distinguishing it from the North American subspecies of Greater White-fronted Goose, also a rare visitor to the northeast.
Bill color is the most frequently-mentioned field mark – supposedly orange on Greenland birds and pinkish on North American – but this has been refuted multiple times (see Kenn Kaufmann’s note in Birding 1994, my blog post here). I suspect this is a mark that works in Europe, where local White-fronts are reliably pink-billed, but not in North America, where lots of the local birds look more or less orange-billed.
Over the last few weeks a single adult White-fronted Goose has been frequenting farm fields near my home in Concord, Massachusetts, and about a week ago it was joined by a second bird (well… “joined” is an overstatement since they pay no attention to each other and keep apart in the big flock of Canada Geese).
These two individuals, in their details, are really strikingly different, and the differences all lead me to the conclusion that the new arrival is a Greenland bird, and the other a North American bird. On 19 November I was able to get some photos of the Greenland-type bird, and I’ve annotated a photo here with the differences between it and the North American-type bird. The differences are listed simply from front to rear, not in order of importance. (I’ll try to get some photos of the other bird to post here for comparison).
Presumed Greenland Greater White-fronted Goose, 19 November 2008, Concord, MA. Photo by David Sibley
- bill color slightly more orange, with yellow base (vs. orange with pale pink base on the other bird); but this is very very difficult to judge and essentially worthless as a field mark (see my post from last fall about judging bill color).
- whole head nearly uniform dark brownish, sometimes looking paler on the cheeks but still with solidly dark crown above the eyes (vs. paler gray-brown head and neck with narrow dark crown stripe and contrasting dark border along white front). This is highly dependent on lighting, and would be difficult to judge on a lone bird, but the Greenland-type bird does look consistently darker, and may show a contrasting dark hind-neck that the other bird doesn’t, but I need to check that in more lighting conditions.
- neck strikingly thick and heavy, no thinner than the head (vs. neck slender, obviously narrower than the head and looking graceful and slim). This is one of the most obvious differences on these two individuals.
- margins of mantle and scapular feathers pale brownish, not strongly contrasting (vs. margins whitish, more strongly contrasting).
- white border on flank feathers narrower and not extending as far forward (vs. broader and longer)
- pale tips on median coverts narrow and not white, relatively inconspicuous (vs. broader, whitish, conspicuous)
- greater coverts without pale edges, and with narrow and inconspicuous whitish tips (vs. obvious narrow white edges and broad white tips forming a conspicuous narrow white band across edge of folded wing). This is another obvious difference between these two individuals.
- black smudges all over the small feathers of the belly between the legs and extending well behind the legs (vs. this area virtually all white). This is separate from the irregular black bands before the legs and up onto the flanks, which are marked similarly in both birds.
- white tips on the tail feathers seem to be narrower on the Greenland-type, but this is very difficult to see in the field.
Overall the Greenland-type bird appears bulkier, heavy-billed and thick-necked, and darker, without the elegant white fringes that are prominent on the rear upperparts of the North American-type.
Here’s another photo of the Greenland-type bird, showing the heavy orange bill, dark and thick neck, and the lack of contrasting edges on the feathers across the shoulders. But none of that is very helpful in a single photo without another bird for comparison, nor is it likely to be very helpful on a single bird in the field.
I know that some of these things have been described before, and they are still pretty subjective, and it’s not safe to generalize from a single individual, but if this is a typical Greenland White-front, then I feel more hopeful about identifying the subspecies.
notes:
Martin Reid’s website has some other discussion, photos, and lots references
Great post, David. We’ve had several claims of the Greenland subspecies of Greater White-fronted Goose here in Ohio, based entirely on a perceived brighter ornage bill color. I am suspect of them all, and think that this subspecies deserves closer scrutiny if a GW Goose is supected of being a Greenland type. Your blog article will be a big help to birders trying to separate these subspecies.
I think the scientific name for the Greenland subspecies would be Anser albifrons flavirostris, though, not A. frontinalis flavirostris…?
I believe A. albifrons frontinalis is the subspecies nesting across North America.
Jim McCormac
Hi David- I read both of your articles on identifying Greenland GWFG with great interest after someone from Europe suggested that I bird I had photographed a couple of years ago might be one. However in addition I looked at many photos of birds identified as flavirostris online, including a number that had been neck banded on the breeding site.
Based on the observations of those photos I believe that some of what you have indicated is indeed true (In particular points regarding pale edging on feathers, thinner flank stripe, and browner head) , but other traits seem to not be consistent. In particular your emphasis on neck thickness may only be relevant to male birds. Based on a number of photos females often seem to show a much thinner neck. http://greenland2012.wikispaces.com/Recoveries+and+resightings (scroll down to the bottom of this document – interestingly also pink billed!); https://www.birdguides.com/iris/pictures.asp?v=1&f=348528 ; https://www.birdguides.com/webzine/article.asp?a=3902 ; https://www.birdguides.com/iris/pictures.asp?mode=search&tx=95&rty=0&r=1&off=348004&gallery=0&v=0 I am unsure about juvenile birds in this regard. The spotting between the hind legs seems ‘mostly true’ though the bird guide web site shows some birds that do not show that trait: https://www.birdguides.com/iris/pictures.asp?mode=search&tx=95&rty=0&r=1&off=347714&gallery=0&v=0
At any rate thanks for the thought provoking blog!